Tuesday, 4 March 2008

Provocative statements from Michael Burleigh's Blood and Rage

The readiness of the British government to treat with individuals (Sinn Fein) it had recently dismissed as murderers was noteworthy, with the lengthy talks themselves generating all manner of human sympathies among the negotiating parties. Just in case they failed, Lloyd George threatened to wage all-out war with the entire resources of the British Empire within three days....Ironically, the provisional government resorted to measures indistinguishable from the British to win what had become a civil war - although unlike the British it had the support of the Catholic Church, which eagerly excommunicated the IRA.

It was Alexander's tragedy that, having failed to institute thoroughgoing liberal reforms, he proved incapable of re-establishing his father's austere police regime too....The intelligentsia were a sub-set of the educated classes, encompassing those who talked about books they hadn't read....They were kept afloat like some speculative fraud, on a bubble of liberal good taste, for among an older generation corrupted by liberalism it was not done to challenge youth or its progressive causes until the example of renegade Dostoyevsky gave birth to a right-wing intelligentsia late in the day....Middle-aged and elderly dupes saw in Nechaev the wayward idealism of youth rather than a psychopathic conman.....Many people with liberal views irresponsibly sympathised with the terrorists up to the point of aiding and abetting them....

The British Labour Party and the German Social Democrats acting as ignorant cheerleaders....Indeed, fear of foreign liberal opinion inhibited a tsarist regime sensitive to the charge of being Asiatic from adopting effective measures to repress terrorism.

This was the first in a spate of assassinations that made the years 1894-1901 more lethal for rulers than at any other time in history.....The multfarious acts of anarchist violence achieved nothing beyond the individual tragedies of the people killed and maimed. [US] immigrants who "converted" to anarchism in their first three years in the country could be deported, an interesting example of conditional citizenship....the British persisted in maintaining liberal asylum law that anarchists were manifestly abusing.

Mrs Thatcher on the Fenian hunger strikers: "There is no such thing as political murder, political bombing or political violence. There is only criminal murder, criminal bombing and criminal violence. We shall not compromise on this. There will be no political status." The fact that special category status had been conceded in 1972 rather militated against that degree of certainty, as did the wording of The Prevention of Terrorism Act itself, under which these men had been imprisoned, since it spoke of "the use of violence for political ends".

Books on German left-wing terrorism never include chapters on the working class, a revealing omission that distinguishes Germany from Italy. There was no significant radicalism in working-class Germany unless you count young neo-Nazis., chiefly because workers were generally represented, as of right, on the managing boards of most companies.... But, as in Italy, the West German higher education system had been massified...."The Vietnam War is not what interests me, but difficulties with my orgasm do," as one Communard put it.

The group's preference was for powerful BMWs, so much so hat colloquially they were known as Baader Meinhof Wagen.

Insofar as the RAF prisoners had a strategy, it was to dramatise their predicament, making it seem as if the German state had finally let slip its mask to receal a Fascist inner heart...The detainees claimed they were being held in conditions resembling Auschwitz...The remand prisoners were permitted radios and record players...They received any reading matter they wished, which enable Baader to study theories he had spouted as slogans for years. In this fashion they built up extensive libraries (Baader some 974 books, Raspe a further 550)....Left-liberal defence lawyers, whose cynical occuupation of the high ground spared them from close press scrutiny, played a major role in facilitating communication between their imprisoned clients and the next generation of RAF terrorists.


There is something narcissistic about this assumption that the West is obsessed with Islam and seeks to destroy it. It is not. It is obsessed with itself, followed by China, India, and Russia, which jostle for Westerners' short attention span. It is drawn, wearily, into so many Middle Eastern crises because this region, with a manufacturing capacity only equal to that of...Nokia...is the primary source of instability in the modern world and sits on top of two thirds of the world's known oil reserves. If huge oil deposits were discovered beneath Canada, the West would disengage from the Middle East tomorrow, leaving it to implode amid its multiple conflicts.

Multiculturism means that each diverse group adopted a story of victimhood so as to put itself beyond close scrutiny, enveloping itself in the myth of moral purity that comes with being the historically oppressed. These diverse communities spoke to the government through their so-called community leaders, a liberal version of an imperial power dealking through nabobs and tribes with the natives....

Multiculturalism is likewise negligent of the shared moral values that make civilised living possible.

By sharing a common password, it was possible to access messages left in the Draft box, which technically, therefore, were read but never sent, thereby preventing the NSA from intercepting them.

Within weeks of 9/11 Bush became the first US President to ackowledge the desirability of the two state solution in Israel-Palestine, in an attempt to cauterise the issue that so antagonises the Muslim world. He then spent six years doing nothing about it.

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

Can rights be subject to a trade-off?

The background hum of stress as inalienable human rights are eroded. Today, in the New York Review of Books, Jeremy Waldron:

"The stakes are much higher in the trade-off between liberty and security. For what is traded off is something that was previously regarded as a right, and the loss of that right may simply be imposed on the people affected. This is troubling because rights are supposed to be guarantees given to individuals and minorities about the outer limits of the sacrifices that might reasonably be required of them. Rights are supposed to restrict trade-offs, not to be traded off themselves."

It seems to me self-evident that we are naive to trade rights for security, because we then have no course for redress when those keeping us secure abuse their power. Apparently, no-one else gives a shit. I look at my friends. All Ivy League educated. All successful. All bright. None of them care about anything more profound than whether they made the Lufthansa Hons programme. But let me not appear judgmental. My concern about terror is a low background hum. I worry about it as I sit in the BA executive lounge working out whether I can make Gold this year. Bad things happen when good people are out spending their Amex reward points.

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

You hate the ones you love the most: it's a subtle form of compliment

Wandering onto the Grauniad's website to read reviews of SARABAND - latest in the Bergman pantheon I am trawling through. I note their kind offer to submit a review of CONTROL on their "filmblog" page. Half the time the self-appointed mainstream media is having a go at Blogs for doing down investigative journalism et al. The other half of the time they are busy co-opting the new format to prove they are down with the kids. It's symptomatic of the self-regarding cant that suffuses the entirety of the press. They should spend less time bleating about right-wing ranters in the Texas putting them out of business and do some proper investigative journalism instead. The war in Iraq proved how far the fourth estate had become co-opted by the executive and its PR flunkies. If I'm going to get biased rants in the broadsheet press I may as well get it free on-line at blogger. Of course, that's not a solution either. I want thinking journalism. But my government's decided that I don't want to pay for it and the BBC is cutting jobs in factual programming. Eheu, o me miserum.

Friday, 27 May 2005

Christopher Doyle on 2046

I feel that 2046 is unnecessary, in retrospect. I think probably Wong Kar Wei realised that somewhere and that's why it took so long. You do realise that you have basically said what you needed to say, so why say more?

Wednesday, 27 April 2005

On The Buccaneers

"Miss Testvalley comes to regret what she has done and so she should. It is entirely out of keeping with the character and values she is meant to represent." 

But it's not the case. In the synopsis it says Miss Testvalley is instrumental but in the novel she does little specific other than get them to the UK. She even advises Tintagel against proposing to Nan. We know nothing of Hector and Lizzie. Lizzie orchestrates Virginia and Seadown.

Sunday, 27 March 2005

Taki on Porfirio Rubirosa

Had he been wearing his seatbelt nothing would have happened to him. But had he been wearing his belt, he would not have been Porfirio Rubirosa.

Wednesday, 5 January 2005

On The Aviator

The substance of The Aviator is endless jive. By and large Howard Hughes made lousy movies and he made bad planes too, at least, when he was using the government's money. He had money to waste and he wasted it. He didn't have anyone's ass to kiss, which in Hollywood must often seem like heaven, but it didn't make him a genius. Scorsese seems to be channeling Vincente Minelli in one year and Douglas Sirk in the other. Queer theorists will be living off this film for decades.